Why trust science? / Naomi Oreskes

By:

Oreskes, Naomi, 1958- [VerfasserIn]

Resource type: Ressourcentyp: Buch (Online)Book (Online)Language: English Series: The University Center for Human Values series | The University Center for Human Values Series ; 3Publisher: Princeton ; Oxford : Princeton University Press, [2019]Distributor: Berlin, Germany : Walter de Gruyter GmbHDescription: 1 Online-Ressource (x, 360 Seiten)ISBN:

9780691189932

Subject(s):

Additional physical formats: 9780691179001 | Erscheint auch als: Why trust science?. Druck-Ausgabe Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2019. x, 360 SeitenDDC classification:

303.483
910 300

RVK: RVK: TB 5000Local classification: Lokale Notation: allg 5.041LOC classification:

Q175.5

DOI: DOI: 10.1515/9780691189932Online resources:

Summary: Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction / Macedo, Stephen -- Chapter 1. Why Trust Science? Perspectives from the History and Philosophy of Science -- Chapter 2. Science Awry -- Coda: Values in Science -- Comments -- Chapter 3. The Epistemology of Frozen Peas: Innocence, Violence, and Everyday Trust in Twentieth-Century Science / Lindee, Susan -- Chapter 4. What Would Reasons for Trusting Science Be? / Lange, Marc -- Chapter 5. Pascal’s Wager Reframed: Toward Trustworthy Climate Policy Assessments for Risk Societies / Edenhofer, Ottmar / Kowarsch, Martin -- Chapter 6. Comments on the Present and Future of Science, Inspired by Naomi Oreskes / Krosnick, Jon A. -- Response -- Chapter 7. Reply -- Afterword -- Notes -- References -- Contributors -- IndexSummary: Why the social character of scientific knowledge is the reason why we can trust itDo doctors really know what they are talking about when they tell us vaccines are safe? Should we take climate experts at their word when they warn us about the perils of global warming? Why should we trust science when our own politicians don't? In this landmark book, Naomi Oreskes offers a bold and compelling defense of science, revealing why the social character of scientific knowledge is its greatest strength—and the greatest reason we can trust it.Tracing the history and philosophy of science from the late nineteenth century to today, Oreskes explains that, contrary to popular belief, there is no single scientific method. Rather, the trustworthiness of scientific claims derives from the social process by which they are rigorously vetted. This process is not perfect—nothing ever is when humans are involved—but she draws vital lessons from cases where scientists got it wrong. Oreskes shows how consensus is a crucial indicator of when a scientific matter has been settled, and when the knowledge produced is likely to be trustworthy.Based on the Tanner Lectures on Human Values at Princeton University, this timely and provocative book features critical responses by climate experts Ottmar Edenhofer and Martin Kowarsch, political scientist Jon Krosnick, philosopher of science Marc Lange, and science historian Susan Lindee, as well as a foreword by political theorist Stephen MacedoOther relationships: Weitere Beziehungen:

Rezensiert in: Wuttke, Alexander, 1986 - . [Rezension von: Naomi Oreskes, 1958-, Why trust science ...]. 2020

PPN: PPN: 1681396653Package identifier: Produktsigel: EBA-EBKALL | EBA-PPALL | GBV-deGruyter-alles | ZDB-23-DGG | ZDB-23-DPM

Holdings ( 0 )

No physical items for this record